NATIONAL MOTORISTS ASSOCIATION

NMA Seal Massachusetts Page MA Seal


Nader

Q: Isn't it true air bags save lives?

A: Yes. They also take lives.





Q: Aren't air bags the greatest safety improvement since the invention of seat belts?

A: "Passenger air bags may be a hazard to unrestrained children and of little benefit to unrestrained adults." (Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, August 2002)





Q: Aren't the parents to blame for letting children ride up front?

A: About half of the victims were adults. One victim was a properly belted, 12-year old boy in Minnesota. According to the government, he was old enough to ride up front...
Forty-year-old Amy Beth Kambury from Portland, OR was driving her 4-year-old daughter to school in 1995 when another vehicle crossed the center line and hit her Jeep Cherokee head-on. Kambury reportedly bled to death within several hours of the crash, because the air bag delivered a blow to her abdomen, tearing her inferior vena cava, a major vein that brings blood to the heart. Her daughter was sitting in the passenger seat, which had no air bag and she survived.





Q: But almost every adult can adjust their seat to the government recommended distance of 10 inches from the air bag!

A: This is true for average adults, but not for many women under 5'2" tall. Also this measurement doesn't take into account any the pre-impact braking that occurs in over 70% of all accidents and which pushes occupants forward. Also at risk are those of any size who happened to be out of position (reaching for a dashboard control, opening the glovebox or tuning the radio, leaning forward to turn, checking a blind spot, etc.), AND those of any size whose hands and/or arms happened to be in the way of the airbag in any low speed (10 mph) impact.





Q: Aren't air bags considered just a supplementary safety device designed to prevent head injuries?

A: Currently the Department of Transportation mandates air bags installed in cars sold in United States must be tested to protect an adult male in a head-on collision. However these air bags are designed to be the PRIMARY SAFETY DEVICE for an UNBELTED crash-test dummy. That makes them much too powerful for most Americans (73%) who always wear their seat belts.





Q: You mean they don't prevent head injuries?

A: While preventing some types of head injuries, air bags also cause routine injuries, such as forearm fractures, facial burns and lacerations, hearing damage (sometimes permanent), eyesight damage (sometimes permanent), spine and spinal cord injuries, ribcage fractures, aggravated asthma and heart conditions and others.

Consider just these two problems associated with air bags:






Q: Well, my mother was in an accident and while the air bag did brake her forearm, at least it save her life. Thank god she was wearing her seat belt!

A: How can you tell air bag saved her life? Since for most Americans seat belts are the primary restraining system, for them the air bags are much too powerful. Chances are it was her seat belt that saved her life, not the air bag. While you're only speculating about the benefit of air bags, their side effect is undeniable.

According to a study by the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, published in the October 2000 issue of the American Journal of Public Health, injuries due to driver-side air bags ranged from cuts and bruises to fatalities. Injuries among male drivers increased when air bags deployed at speeds below 8 mph. But the likelihood of injury caused by an air bag among female drivers increased in all crashes below 32 mph, the study said.







Q: So what are air bags good for?

A: The real benefit from airbags is in a high speed direct frontal accident, say 30 mph into a fixed barrier or about 60 mph into a vehicle of the same weight.  This type of accident is only a small percentage of all accidents.  Otherwise, front airbags are useless or net negative in side accidents, rollovers, rear-enders, and slower speed accidents (assuming you have belts on).  But, they deploy in many of these cases...

In an overwhelming majority of air bag deployments (3,697,693 out of 3,700,000 between 1986 and 1998), air bags had no effect on the survivability of the occupants one way or the other. The added cost of repairing air bag damage however made thousands of otherwise salvageable automobiles a total loss.
In other words, in 3,700,000 documented deployments since 1986, NHTSA estimated 3,625 lives were saved and admitted between 1990 and 1998, 122 lives were lost in otherwise minor (i.e. low speed) accidents. And 40 more fatalities are still under investigation, until the head of NHTSA signs off on them. To me and a growing number of other people, facts like these are simply UNACCEPTABLE.





Q: But to me, air bags are like flu shots. A few people may be allergic, but most people will benefit. Right?

A: First of all, flu shots are optional, which is not the case with frontal air bags. Beyond that, because of threat of air bags, American people are now expected to fundamentally modify their behavior in their own cars. No longer can parents sit next to their children; short people cannot sit in a comfortable position anymore; under the threat of potential injury and possible death, nobody should be leaning forward; and in cars with side air bags, children shouldn't rest their heads against the doors any longer. Why? Because it's estimated in the last 12 years air bags saved maybe 3500 - mostly unbelted - people.





Q: Couldn't air bags be considered an 'insurance' that could one day save your life?

A: At roughly $1,500 per car, air bags are a very inefficient way of saving lives. For instance, instead of air bags, investing the $1,500 per car into increasing seat belt compliance to 90% would prevent over 5,500 deaths - annually. Putting $1,500 into crash prevention, such as better training of drivers, would also save far more lives than air bags ever did. And for many individuals, investing $1,500 into better tires would be a safer choice than air bags.

Two Transport Canada studies were uncovered in September 2000 as part of a CBC Marketplace investigation into air bag safety. They show air bags reduce the risk of injury by just two percent for adults who wear seat belts. On the other hand, a car 200 pounds heavier than baseline gives you 9% greater safety in a crash, all by itself and another 200 pounds, another 9%.





Q: But what about the 'second generation,' de-powered air bags? Those are safe, right?

A: 16 year old son Shawn Simpkins was driving his parents' 1998 Dakota pickup with his seat belt on when he had a one car accident that ended with an off-center right-front hit to a tree - probably at about 26 mph. The only mark on Shawn's body was the small air bag abrasion on his chin, where the air bag snapped his head back hard enough to break the brainstem. This was a Second Generation (20% to 35% depowered) bag but it was still fatal to Shawn. This should have been a fully-survivable accident, with only minor injuries as the result. Shawn should only have received bumps and bruises, except for the deadly air bag... NHTSA's Special Crash Investigations website lists his injuries as caused by the air bag - listing #163.





Q: What about 'smart' air bags?

A: So far among others:

So far, one out of every 20 air bag-equipped vehicle on the nation's highway has been subject to federal investigation for air bag related complaints.

If automakers are having problems making the simple systems safe for us, is mandating more complex and more expensive sensors, processors and actuators really the answer? I think the recent recall of other 'smart' air bags in 7,000 Porsche's and 4,163 1999 E-Class Mercedes-Benz sedans point to the answer...


WASHINGTON (AP) - Nissan Motor Co. is recalling 13,757 Quest minivans because the passenger air bag could inflate when there's a child in the front seat, a company spokesman said Wednesday. The recall involves Quests from the 2004 model year. Nissan discovered during vehicle testing that the air bags could fire when a dummy the size of a 6-year-old was in the front passenger seat. Federal standards require many new vehicles to have advanced air bag systems, which detect the weight of a passenger and don't fire the air bags if the passenger is too small to withstand the force.

"Adding explosives to the interior of a car isn't my idea of making cars safer. Having those explosives monitored and triggered by the cheapest-possible electronics doesn't add any confidence."

air bag damage


Back to Frequently Asked Questions



About the NMA / Join the NMA / Contact the NMA / NMA Home